Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Case: McPhillamy v. The Queen

Date: 09 August 2018

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 2h 05m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Case: Comptroller General of Customs v. Zappia

Date: 08 August 2018

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 3h 19m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Case: Rodi v. State of Western Australia

Date: 07 August 2018

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 2h 04m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

The Commonwealth of Australia & Anor v. Commissioner Bret Walker SC & Anor

Case No.

C7/2018

Case Information

Catchwords

Whether the Royal Commissions Act 1917 (SA) authorises the Commissioner of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission (SA) to issue summonses requiring the attendance of, or to require the production of documents from, current and former officers or employees of the Commonwealth or of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (Cth) or residents of another State, or to impose penalties for failure to comply with such summonses. In the alternative, whether ss 10(b)-(d) and ss11(1)(f),11(2) and 11(3) of the Act are constitutionally invalid in their application to such persons.

Documents*

13/06/2018 Writ of summons

13/06/2018 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiffs)

14/06/2018 Submitting appearance (First Defendant)

21/06/2018 Hearing (Single Justice, Brisbane by video-link to Adelaide and Canberra)

04/07/2018 Notice of constitutional matter (Second Defendant)

30/07/2018 Hearing (Single Justice, Brisbane by video-link to Adelaide and Melbourne)

06/08/2018 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)

07/08/2018 Chronology (Plaintiffs)

17/08/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales intervening)

28/08/2018 Consent orders discontinuing proceedings

09/10/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) - VACATED

*The due dates shown for documents on this page are indicative only. 

TTY167 v. Republic of Nauru

Case No.

S46/2018

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

20/02/2018 Supreme Court of Nauru (Judge Marshall)

[2018] NRSC 4

Catchwords

APPEAL - Refugee Status Review Tribunal - whether Tribunal denied Appellant natural justice by not adjourning hearing - where Appellant failed to attend the hearing - where there was no request for an adjournment - whether the Tribunal was unreasonable or biased - s 41 of the Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr)

Short particulars

Documents

12/03/2018 Notice of appeal

17/04/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)

17/04/2018 Chronology (Appellant)

15/05/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)

05/06/2018 Reply (Applicant)

29/06/2018 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney)

13/09/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) - VACATED

07/11/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

07/11/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

07/11/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)

05/12/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Page 107 of 258