Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Perara-Cathcart v. The Queen
Date: 11 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 10m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
- Palmer v. Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their capacities as liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
- Ferguson v. Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their capacities as liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Date: 10 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 56m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
- Western Australian Planning Commission v. Southregal Pty Ltd & Anor
- Western Australian Planning Commission v. Leith
Date: 09 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 32m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: RP v. The Queen
Date: 08 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 35m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Plaintiff M96A/2016 & Anor v. Commonwealth of Australia & Anor
Case No.
M96/2016
Case Information
Catchwords
Plaintiffs from Iran - arrived on Christmas island in 2013 - taken to Nauru where detained pursuant to regional processing arrangements - November 2014 brought to Australia under s198B Migration Act for "temporary purpose" ie medical treatment - plaintiffs challenge validity of detention in Australia since 2014 - whether detention in Australia validly authorised by ss189 and 196 Migration - whether ss189 & 196 are beyond constitutional power
Documents
15/07/2016 Application for an order to show cause
04/08/2016 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiffs)
14/09/2016 Consent as to directions
20/10/2016 Demurrer (Defendants)
02/11/2016 Order by consent referring Demurrer to Full Court
28/11/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)
28/11/2016 Chronology
20/12/2016 Written submissions (Defendants)
27/01/2017 Reply
14/02/2017 Consent order amending title of proceeding
21/02/2017 Amended Demurrer
01/03/2017 Amended written submissions (Plaintiffs)
01/03/2017 Amended reply
03/03/2017 Amended written submissions (Defendants)
08/03/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
03/05/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)