Please be advised that the High Court building in Canberra will be closed to the public for an event from Wednesday, 19 November to Friday, 21 November 2025.

Chiro v. The Queen

Case No. A9/2017
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

30/09/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Vanstone J, Kelly J, David AJ)

[2015] SASCFC 142

Catchwords

Criminal law – Sentencing – Where appellant convicted by jury of “persistent sexual exploitation of a child” pursuant to Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 50 – Where complainant gave evidence of sexual exploitation that ranged in seriousness – Where trial judge directed jury they may convict if unanimously satisfied that appellant kissed complainant in circumstances amounting to indecent assault on two occasions – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal erred in failing to hold trial judge erred in failing to ask jury which sexual offences subject of unanimous guilty verdict for purposes of sentencing – Whether in absence of such answer it was open to sentencing jury to sentence on basis that appellant guilty of all alleged sexual offending.

Short particulars

Documents

10/02/2017 Hearing (SLA, Canberra v/link Adelaide)

24/02/2017 Notice of appeal

17/03/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)

17/03/2017 Chronology (Appellant)

07/04/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)

21/04/2017 Reply

20/06/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Adelaide)

21/06/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Adelaide)

13/09/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)