DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Crime and Corruption Commission v. Carne

Case No. B66/2022
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

05/08/2022 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Mullins & McMurdo JJA, Freeburn J)

[2022] QCA 141

Catchwords

Constitutional law – Legislature – Privileges – Privilege of parliamentary debate and proceedings – Where Crime and Corruption Commission ("Commission") received complaint as to allegations of corrupt conduct against respondent, former Public Trustee of Queensland – Where, following investigation, Commission prepared  draft report, which did not make any finding of corrupt conduct – Where Commission submitted copy of Report to Chair of Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee ("PCCC") and requested, pursuant to s 69(1)(b) of Crime and Corruption Act 2001 (Qld) ("CC Act"), that it be given to Speaker – Where respondent filed originating application seeking declaration that report was not "report" for purposes of s 69(1) of CC Act – Where Chair of PCCC issued evidentiary certificate under s 55 of Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 (Qld) ("POQ Act") certifying report as: document prepared for purpose of, or incidental to, transacting business of PCCC under s 9(2)(c) of CC Act; and document present or submitted to PCCC – Where s 8(1) of POQ Act provides proceedings in Assembly cannot be impeached or questioned in any court – Whether parliamentary privilege protects reports prepared for and provided to parliamentary committees under POQ Act. 

Statutes – Acts of Parliament – Interpretation – Where s 33 of CC Act provides for Commission's corruption functions – Where s 64 of CC Act provides Commission may report in performing its functions – Where s 69(1) provides report may be tabled in Parliament when report is made on a public hearing or report is directed to be given to Speaker – Where respondent contended that because report did not make finding of "corrupt conduct" and did not relate to public hearing, it was not report for purposes of s 69 of CC Act – Whether Commission only able to report about corruption investigation under CC Act where positive finding of "corrupt conduct". 

Documents

15/12/2022 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)

23/12/2022 Notice of appeal

02/02/2023 Written submissions (Appellant)

02/02/2023 Chronology (Appellant)

24/02/2023 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, seeking leave to intervene)

24/02/2023 Written submissions (Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland, seeking leave to intervene)

10/03/2023 Written submissions (Respondent)

30/03/2023 Reply (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, seeking leave to intervene)

31/03/2023 Reply (Appellant)

06/06/2023 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

06/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

06/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)

06/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, intervening)

05/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland, intervening)

07/06/2023 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

13/09/2023 Judgment (Judgment summary)