Dayney v. The King
Case No.
B69/2023
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
6/04/2023 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Mullins P; Dalton JA; Boddice J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Appeal against conviction – Self-defence against provoked assault – Criminal Code (Qld), s 272 – Where appellant involved in violent altercation resulting in death of another individual – Where appellant convicted of murder – Where appellant successfully appealed conviction – Where s 272 of Criminal Code (Qld) affords defence of self-defence against provoked assault – Where majority in first appeal held final clause of s 272(2) ousts protection afforded by s 271(1) only where force used in self-defence results in death or grievous bodily harm – Where minority held final clause of s 272(2) applies to modify effect of first two clauses in s 272(2) – Where jury in retrial directed in accordance with majority’s interpretation of s 272 and appellant convicted of murder – Where appellant appeals second time on ground minority’s interpretation of s 272(2) in first appeal is correct and decision of majority plainly wrong – Whether Court of Appeal erred in holding final clause of s 272(2) constitutes standalone exception to protection afforded by self-defence against provoked assault – Proper meaning of “before such necessity arose”.
Documents*
21/11/2023 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)
05/12/2023 Notice of appeal
23/01/2024 Written submissions (Appellant)
23/01/2024 Chronology (Appellant)
20/02/2024 Written submissions (Respondent)
12/03/2024 Reply
19/04/2024 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
19/04/2024 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
19/04/2024 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)