Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Sio v. The Queen

Case No. S83/2016 and S241/2015
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

31/03/2015 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Leeming JA, Johnson J, Schmidt J)

[2015] NSWCCA 42

Catchwords

Criminal law – conviction appeal – armed robbery – joint criminal enterprise – unreasonable verdict – where appellant was acquitted of constructive murder based on the appellant’s participation in a joint criminal enterprise to commit armed robbery – where appellant was convicted of armed robbery with wounding – whether appellant’s conviction on alternative count is inconsistent with acquittal on principle count.

Criminal law – evidence – hearsay rule – accomplice – made admission against interest in police interview – accomplice not available - whether the trial judge was required to take into account the “demonstrable unreliability” of individual representations to determine whether interview was “made in circumstance that made it likely the representation was reliable”.

Short Particulars

Documents

11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

23/03/2016 Notice of appeal

12/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant/Applicant)

12/04/2016 Chronology (Appellant/Applicant)

03/05/2016 Amended written submissions (Appellant/Applicant)

06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)

20/05/2016 Reply

15/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

24/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)