Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Duncan v. Independent Commission against Corruption
Date: 05 August 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 14m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Alcan Gove Pty Ltd v. Zabic
Date: 04 August 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 27m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
| Alcan Gove Pty Ltd v. Zabic |
Wei v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Case No.
S9/2015
Case Information
Catchwords
Migration – Visa cancellation – Where plaintiff is a Chinese national who arrived on a student visa in September 2008 – Where plaintiff commenced and completed a “Foundation Program” at Macquarie University (“University”) – Where university failed to issue a Confirmation of Enrolment – Where the failure to issue the confirmation lead to the appearance that plaintiff breached the terms of visa – Where defendant?s delegate cancelled plaintiff?s visa on 20 March 2014 on this basis - Whether plaintiff should have been granted an extension of time for making application – Whether decision of defendant?s delegate to cancel plaintiff?s visa was vitiated by jurisdictional error or breach of requirements of procedural fairness.
Documents
08/01/2015 Application for an order to show cause
07/04/2015 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney)
11/05/2015 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra v/link Sydney)
15/06/2015 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra v/link Sydney)
20/08/2015 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney)
04/09/2015 Written submissions (Plaintiff)
04/09/2015 Chronology (Plaintiff)
25/09/2015 Written submissions (Defendant)
30/09/2015 Amended written submissions (Plaintiff)
16/10/2015 Reply
12/11/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
17/12/2015 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Allen v. Chadwick
Case No.
A14/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
16/09/2014; 24/11/2014 Supreme Court of South Australia (Kourakis CJ, Gray J, Nicholson J)
[2014] SASCFC 100; [2014] SASCFC 130
Catchwords
Torts – Negligence – Contributory negligence – Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA) ss 47 and 49 – Where respondent was injured in a car accident after appellant lost control of the vehicle – Where appellant was intoxicated – Where respondent was not wearing a seatbelt – Whether a reasonable person in the position of respondent would or ought to have known that appellant was intoxicated and would have relied on appellant to drive – Whether respondent had an opportunity to fasten the seatbelt – Whether damages should include or exclude GST.
Documents
19/06/2015 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
02/07/2015 Notice of appeal
24/07/2015 Written submissions (Appellant)
24/07/2015 Chronology (Appellant)
13/08/2015 Written submissions (Respondent)
13/08/2015 Chronology (Respondent)
27/08/2015 Reply
15/10/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
09/12/2015 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Commonwealth of Australia v. Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate & Ors
Case No.
B36/2015
Related matter
B45/2015 - Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Anor v. Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate & Anor
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
1/05/2015 Federal Court of Australia (Dowsett J, Greenwood J, Wigney J)
Catchwords
Procedure – Civil penalty provisions – Where, in proceedings between respondent and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“CFMEU”) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (“CEPU”), respondent alleged that the CFMEU and CEPU contravened the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) – Where respondent sought pecuniary penalties and associated declaratory relief against the CFMEU and CEPU – Whether the High Court of Australia’s decision in Barbaro v The Queen affects submissions made regarding civil penalties.
Documents
18/06/2015 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)
29/06/2015 Notice of appeal
22/07/2015 Written submissions (Appellant)
22/07/2015 Chronology (Appellant)
12/08/2015 Written submissions (Amicus curiae)
13/08/2015 Written submissions (First Respondent)
13/08/2015 Written submissions (Second and Third Respondents)
26/08/2015 Reply
13/10/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
09/12/2015 Judgment (Judgment summary)